
ZeroFox vs Doppel
Choose ZeroFox. You want to stop threats, not study them.
ZeroFox: The leader in digital threat disruption
Here's 5 things Doppel can't and won't deliver:

Doppel’s automation-only strategy promises a streamlined experience. In reality? It’s a nonstop stream of useless alerts and endless configuration chaos with zero clarity. Real threats across email, social media, the dark web, executive targets, and physical domains slip through the cracks. Why? Because if AI can’t guess it, Doppel can’t catch it.
Doppel isn’t simplifying security. They’re simplifying your path to exposure. Get ZeroFox—before exposures becomes exploits.
| Endless alert spamming | Precision intelligence, tuned to you | |
| One, single domain (ouch) | Every digital touchpoint: email, social, dark web, domains, brands, accounts, certificates, third-parties, digital supply chain, TTPs, CTI, physical security intelligence, and executive protection | |
| More errors, faster (and automated) | Expert skill and analysis at machine speed | |
| DIY dashboards, incomplete configs | Stop threats, don’t just study them | |
| Hobbyist cosplaying security | World leader in internet protection | |
| Hopes | Hunts |

In cybersecurity, credibility is earned, not estimated. When you upgrade with ZeroFox, you’re choosing a comprehensive solution with the leader in digital risk protection and the in-house experts to back it up.
A Forrester Consulting Total Economic Impact™ study concluded that customers can see a 267% return on investment (ROI) using ZeroFox Digital Risk Protection.
Decreased risk of executive impersonation
Executive impersonations cost up to $44K per threat. ZeroFox greatly reduces the risk of impersonation and executes takedowns of suspicious content before it becomes a liability.
Reduced cost of fraud takedowns
With ZeroFox, organizations can increase their ability to identify spoofed domains, fake mobile apps, or false social media accounts – and resolve them fast. Automated remediation saves hundreds of thousands in the labor costs over manual takedowns.
