ZeroFox Alternatives: What to Consider When Choosing a Cybersecurity Provider

Criminals no longer need to break into your internal networks to damage your business—instead, they set up shop in third-party online spaces where your customers, partners, or employees can be easily found.

Your Security Operations Center (SOC) team can work around the clock hardening servers and patching endpoints, but your stakeholders are still out there: tweeting, selling, influencing, and bleeding credentials across the web.

Every new TikTok account, every employee selfie that geotags HQ, every third-party marketplace listing is another attack vector for bad actors who are scaling their operations faster than enterprises can keep up. 

Verizon reports that 91% of breaches in North America are caused by attackers from outside the victim’s network. These bad actors use a variety of methods: Credential abuse is one of the primary attack methods and has climbed 34% in just 12 months. Meanwhile, more than 200 million Americans have been targeted by brand impersonations , which now contribute to half of all cyberattacks. The use of fraudulent domains has jumped 40%, and third-party involvement in breaches rose twofold to reach 30%. Phishing attacks alone surged an astonishing 140% over the same period. 

Yet too many companies still treat incidents like these as distractions, instead of the first warning signs of larger attacks that bring serious consequences, including financial damage, legal action and the breakdown of customer relationships: 66% of consumers say they lose trust in a brand after even one incident and 75% would abandon a business that suffers any sort of cybersecurity problem. 

As Josh Mayfield, Senior Director of Product Marketing at ZeroFox, puts it, external cyberthreats aren’t petty inconveniences: “You shouldn't see these as the cost of doing business through a digital storefront. It's not a nuisance, it's fraud, and it's a crime,” he warns.

The TLDR is: Even if your own networks are secure, if your cybersecurity team can’t see and take down threats beyond your firewall, they’re only fighting on a small fraction of the online battlefield. That’s why you need to consider partnering with an external cybersecurity platform like ZeroFox or its competitors.

Read on to explore ZeroFox alternatives and discover what a cybersecurity vendor needs to offer to successfully protect your business from today’s external threats.

10 Signs Your External Cybersecurity Is Compromised

If you have any sort of online presence, your organization is at the mercy of external threats, and attacks of various kinds could be already underway. But without effective monitoring, you may not learn about the damage until confronted by angry customers—or law enforcement. Here are the warning signs that you need to reassess your external security:

1. Phishing Attacks

Criminals frequently impersonate brands to steal customer credentials, and each successful attack damages trust and revenue. Phishing attacks often spike during peak business seasons, with retail brands seeing sharp increases during holiday shopping periods. Sophisticated campaigns now use AI-generated deepfake content, SSL certificates on phishing sites, and multi-stage attacks that bypass traditional mechanisms. The average phishing kit remains active for 36 hours before detection, giving attackers ample time to harvest credentials. 

2. Executive Impersonation Incidents

Threat actors create fake profiles of leadership teams to manipulate employees, partners, and customers. Executive impersonations currently cost organizations up to $44,000 per incident, according to industry data. These attacks extend beyond simple email spoofing—criminals often research executive communication patterns, attend virtual conferences under fake identities, and build relationships over weeks before launching complete digital personas across LinkedIn, Twitter, and industry forums. 

3. Physical Security Threats

Digital threats are increasingly evolving into physical dangers. It often starts with sensitive executive information such as home addresses, family information, and travel schedules leaking via data breaches and social media posts. Threat actors coordinate on encrypted platforms, sharing intelligence about security measures and daily routines before escalating from online harassment to protests, stalking, and violent incidents. 

4. Social Media Account Takeovers

In Account Takeovers (ATOs), hackers compromise official accounts to post malicious content, redirect followers to phishing sites, or damage brand reputations. High-profile takeovers can wipe millions from market valuations within hours. Even dormant accounts pose risks, lacking proper monitoring or two-factor authentication. Account recovery takes time, but lost trust takes a lot longer to repair. 

5. Dark Web Credential Sales

Employee credentials are traded on criminal forums, often bundled with personal information that enables targeted attacks. A single compromised admin account sells for $500-$3,000 on dark web marketplaces. These credentials frequently come from third-party breaches where employees used corporate emails for personal accounts. Stealer malware campaigns harvest saved passwords from browsers, with 1.8 billion credentials compromised in six months alone. Without dark web monitoring, organizations may not discover these leaks until only after successful account takeovers occur.

6. Domain Spoofing

Criminals register lookalike domains to host phishing pages, sell counterfeit products, or distribute malware. These domains often rank high in search results, capture mistyped traffic, and operate for months undetected. Typosquatting affects everyone from small startups to Fortune 500 companies, with attackers registering dozens of variations for popular and trending brands. International domain extensions make monitoring difficult—a single brand may face hundreds of malicious domain registrations annually across different TLDs, enabling thousands of victim interactions.

7. Sensitive Data Breaches

Confidential documents, source code, and employee information can appear on public paste sites, forums, and file-sharing platforms—often posted by disgruntled insiders or after successful breaches. Sensitive information spreads across Pastebin, GitHub gists, Discord servers, and Telegram channels faster than most organizations can detect. A single exposed API key or database dump can compromise entire infrastructures. These exposures operate like time bombs, waiting patiently as searchable and downloadable assets for anyone who cares to look, from competitors and criminals, to nation-state actors. Without continuous monitoring across platforms, organizations may learn about exposures only after a ransomware group posts stolen data as proof, or when customer information appears for sale on criminal markets.

8. Malicious Mobile Apps

Fake apps are published in app stores to steal user data, request payments, or install malware. Sophisticated clones use legitimate app components to pass initial store reviews, and accumulate thousands of downloads before removal. Fake apps often outranking legitimate ones in search results. These apps harvest not just credentials but contact lists, location data, and device identifiers for future attacks. Removal requests take 2–3 weeks on average, during which thousands more users become victims.

9. Third-Party Vendor Failures

Your security increasingly depends on your partners' defenses. If they retain your sensitive information, when they suffer breaches, it might be your data that leaks. Supply chain attacks increasingly target the smallest vendors first, such as legal service providers or marketing agencies, because they typically hold treasure troves of client data but have minimal security budgets. Fourth-party risks compound the problem—your vendor's vendors create invisible attack surfaces. To add insult to injury, your business can face liability even when a breach isn't your fault. 

10. Coordinated Disinformation Campaigns

Bad actors spread false information about organizations to manipulate stock prices, damage reputations, or create chaos. Modern campaigns use bot networks, deepfake videos, and fabricated documents to appear authentic and social media amplifies their attacks instantly. A single false claim can trigger regulatory investigations, cause stock price drops, or spark consumer boycotts. Nation-state actors increasingly target private companies alongside traditional espionage, using disinformation to weaken economic competitors. Detection requires monitoring across platforms, languages, and regional social networks most organizations don't even know exist.

Why Organizations Avoid External Security Protection

Even if an organization understands the scope of the online threat landscape, many have complex internal needs that compete for attention. This situation can lead to dangerous institutional inertia that deters businesses from adopting robust external security measures. To be effective, the best ZeroFox alternatives should not only secure your brand beyond your corporate perimeter, it should also deal with these common corporate concerns:

• Budget Constraints and ROI Uncertainties 

Security investments compete for limited resources, and, because it's difficult to prove a negative, well-protected organizations struggle to quantify prevented attacks. 

• Complexity of Implementation 

New tools typically require integration, training, and process changes. Adding another platform may seem to be an unnecessary additional headache—until a breach occurs. 

• Alert Fatigue and Resource Limitations

Small security teams lack bandwidth for additional responsibilities, while simultaneously dreading increased notifications that external monitoring might generate. Teams worry about more noise without actionable intelligence, compounding their already overwhelming workload.

• Skills Gaps and Specialized Expertise Requirements 

External threat monitoring demands unique skill sets that differ from traditional network security. Teams need expertise in social media platforms, dark web monitoring, brand protection, and takedown procedures. Building these capabilities internally often proves prohibitively expensive—for example, manual takedowns can cost up to $1,000 each versus a fraction of that through specialized vendors. 

• Vendor Sprawl 

Organizations attempting to address external threats regularly accumulate multiple niche vendors—one for executive protection, another for domain monitoring, a third for takedowns. This creates overwhelming vendor management overhead and engineering integration requirements that exhaust already stretched teams. 

• Siloed Security Approaches and Unclear Ownership 

External threats blur traditional boundaries—is a fake social media account IT's problem, Marketing's, or Legal's? This fragmentation leads to incomplete threat visibility, delayed response times, and threats that fall between teams without clear ownership. Without CISO-led strategy, threats outside the perimeter can remain orphaned responsibilities. 

9 Essential Questions to Ask About ZeroFox Alternatives

So, what features should you look for when evaluating ZeroFox alternatives? 

At the very least, the right solution will protect your entire external attack surface, securing everything from social media and domains to executive safety and dark web forums. It should also detect threats in real-time, provide actionable intelligence, and most importantly, take swift measures to neutralize risks before damage occurs. 

Here are some specific questions to ask vendors to help you assess each platform's effectiveness:

Intelligence and Expertise

1. What level of human expertise backs the technology? 

Despite the promises of ZeroFox’s competitors, AI cannot yet be trusted to manage your entire external security posture end-to-end. While excelling at certain tasks, AI-only solutions suffer from critical limitations including the inability to adapt to novel threats, high false positive rates, and overwhelming alert noise that burdens security teams. ZeroFox is an active innovator in AI for security and threat intelligence, backed by over a decade of internet reconnaissance and human expertise.

2. Does the platform provide actionable intelligence or just raw threat data? 

On this question, ZeroFox alternatives swing between opposite extremes: while platforms like Recorded Future overwhelm teams with vast, unfocused threat data requiring extensive internal resources to operationalize, others like Netcraft and Bolster deliver poor-quality outputs—either "sterile reports" lacking actionable insights or AI-generated alerts with high miss rates and less accuracy. ZeroFox has a fundamentally different approach, fine-tuning threat discovery, validation, and disruption to your brand, domains, people, and assets. This gives ZeroFox’s security intelligence relevance by design that others cannot match.

Coverage and Protection Capabilities

3. Does the platform provide comprehensive monitoring across all digital channels? 

Threats can appear anywhere across the open, deep, and dark web, your potential attack surface is as vast as the online world. However, some ZeroFox alternatives focus only on open-source feeds, others on dark-web scrapes, but don’t natively monitor social-media impersonations or mobile-app stores, providing minimal protection and forcing customers to bolt on extra tools. Others are narrower still—scanning only weekly by default, or sticking to checking phishing domains and a short list of social platforms, skipping major regional networks. Threats are multi-faceted and use diverse modes and channels, and ZeroFox’s breadth and global coverage gives you the full picture of emerging threats.

4. How quickly can the platform detect and remove threats? 

The longer a threat is allowed to exist and spread, the more harm it can do. Some competitors rely on third-party contractors or impose monthly takedown quotas, which can stretch response times from hours to days and add unexpected costs. Others automate only narrow slices of threat removals, with social-media or app-store takedowns often dragging out for weeks.

5. Does the solution offer executive and physical security protection? 

With C-suite impersonations up 100% leading to $2 billion in losses annually, not to mention the fact that online posts increasingly spawn physical threats, executive protection has moved from a “nice-to-have” to a board-level imperative. 

Most ZeroFox alternatives stop at alerting customers to fake social profiles or domain spoofs; but don’t watch for doxxing, swatting, travel-route threats, or event-specific risks—and none offer an in-house team that can action takedowns tied to an executive’s name within the hour.

Scalability and Integration

6. Can the platform scale with your organization's growth? 

ZeroFox alternatives present significant scalability challenges: While Bolster's pre-trained AI models fail to keep up with the complex digital footprints of larger enterprises, Recorded Future produces so much data it’s impractical for organizations without extensive resources. Other platforms, like ReliaQuest, often force customers to purchase entire platform bundles rather than scaling services to actual needs, creating unnecessary cost and complexity as organizations grow.

7. How easily does the platform integrate with existing security infrastructure? 

Integration capabilities can determine a security platform's ultimate usefulness—poor integration leads to siloed tools, manual workarounds, and security gaps. Organizations also prefer platforms that complement rather than replace their security stack. Seamless integration maximizes your existing investments, enables automated workflows, and accelerates threat response.

8. What managed service options are available? 

Managed services should provide flexible, 24/7 security support without extensive in-house resources or new hires. They should also offer various levels of assistance, including alert triage, incident response, and analyst-on-demand. Fully white-label options can even enable seamless integration with existing systems while maintaining your branding.

Measuring Value and ROI

9. What measurable returns can you expect? 

You can check how well external-threat platforms pay for themselves by measuring factors like phishing-window dwell time and the elimination of manual takedown labor. Be skeptical of vendors who quote single-digit ROI or give ranges so wide they’re unusable; a few refuse to publish any model at all, leaving buyers to build the business case alone.

ZeroFox Alternatives: The Quest for Comprehensive Security

From tolerating digital crime as business as usual to expecting robust protection in near-real time—organizations often follow a similar learning trajectory as they explore ZeroFox Alternatives and their understanding of external threats deepens. Let’s take a look at the various stages of the journey and find out how to know when you’ve arrived at your destination:

Starting from Scratch: Zero Protection

Many organizations begin with no external protection, viewing threats like domain squatting, phishing redirects, and brand impersonation as the unavoidable costs of digital business. 

While they may feel safe, without external threat intelligence, they frequently won't even know they're being targeted until it’s too late. "If they're lucky, customers will tell them. If they're unlucky, law enforcement will," Mayfield warns.

Stage 1: ReliaQuest – The Bare Minimum

ReliaQuest can be characterized as a basic security service, specifically providing managed detection and response (MDR).

Mayfield highlights that ReliaQuest's use of intelligence is “really for the purpose of detection for their other systems—it's not an end in itself”. 

“In terms of the intelligence they provide and how they productize it, it’s the exact same as Microsoft Defender. The only difference is they wrap it with managed detection services and operate as a service-driven organization in their business model and how they license it,” he says.

“This means their threat intelligence primarily feeds into their own tools to generate alerts, rather than offering clients proactive, comprehensive safeguarding.”

ReliaQuest's intelligence strategy is primarily focused on surface appearance and malicious URLs, biased toward what will throw off a good alert trigger. While effective for known indicators of compromise (IoCs), this approach may not provide the early warning signals needed for proactive defense. 

As Mayfield notes, "They're good at updating filters and indicators and firing off alerts, but not at preemptively finding what could be harmful tomorrow." 

ReliaQuest's elementary solution comes with several further limitations. Their remediation and takedown capabilities are outsourced to a third party and considered weak. This reliance on external vendors can introduce delays and undermine threat mitigation compared to professional services that handle takedowns in-house.

Their offerings are also limited in specific areas, such as social media, executive protection, Digital Risk Protection, and the dark web. Feedback also points to inferior customer service, which has reportedly led to high customer churn. 

ReliaQuest Critical Weaknesses:

• No dark web coverage
• Outsourced takedowns
• Weak social media monitoring and executive protection
• Poor customization
• Subpar customer service
• Forces platform lock-in

Stage 2: Cyberint – Weakened by Acquisition

Cyberint, an Israeli vendor, go further than ReliaQuest to offer Threat Intelligence (TI) and External Attack Surface Management (EASM). However, according to Josh Mayfield, an acquisition by Check Point Software Technologies has led to a shift from innovation to retention: "Cyberint's not getting the investment from Check Point. They're trying to keep customers, but not doing greater development.”

“They cut 20% of their analysts, and they're not investing in intelligence.”

Mayfield points out that their "impotent intelligence" often falls short of practical relevance: "They don't do anything with their intelligence—there's no action on it.”

“You have to wait around for an analyst to come back to you to make sense of something, and when they do, it's just some sterile report that you can't really do anything with". 

Cyberint's offer is also weak due to their shallow disruption and takedown capabilities, completing approximately just 3,600 takedowns in 2023, a stark contrast to ZeroFox's reported 1 million-plus takedowns during the same period. 

Other notable gaps include the lack of a global disruption network, weak social media capabilities, and the absence of features like Account Takeover Protection, In-Line Moderation, Physical Intelligence, or Attack Surface Management (ASM). 

Current geopolitics comes into play here as well, with a general hesitation among customers to purchase Israeli-owned security technology, which could further impact Cyberint's market position and available resources.

Cyberint Critical Weaknesses:

• Impotent intelligence
• Minimal takedown capability
• Limited to 270 takedowns per month
• No Global Disruption Network
• Weak social media capabilities
• No physical intelligence
• Limited AI-driven analysis
• Post-acquisition uncertainty

Stage 3: Netcraft – Automation Without Intelligence

Founded in 1994, Netcraft have built their reputation primarily on automated threat detection and rapid response to phishing attacks, serving as a strategic security vendor for the UK government since 2016.

However, analysis of user feedback highlights many shortcomings with the platform:

Interface and Usability: Multiple users report that Netcraft's interface feels outdated compared to modern security tools. New users particularly struggle with understanding how the system works, citing poor onboarding experiences and inadequate customer support during implementation.

Narrow Focus: While Netcraft perform well in their core domain protection use case, users consistently note limitations beyond phishing and domain monitoring. The platform lacks adequate coverage for social media threats, executive protection, dark web monitoring, and other modern digital risk categories.

Reporting Inflexibility: Limited customization options for reports, with no attack-type reporting or severity-level analysis, make it difficult for security teams to prioritize their work effectively.

Over-automation Issues: The over-dependence on automation, while enabling scale, often leads to false positives and the takedown of legitimate sites.

Integration Challenges: Compared to competitors, Netcraft score badly on integration capabilities, API availability, and third-party resource support according to Gartner metrics.

Limited Market Validation: For a 30-year-old company, Netcraft have inspired surprisingly few users to leave reviews, managing just 7 on G2, and 10 on Gartner Peer Insights.

Most damning of all is that Netcraft receive zero ratings on Gartner Peer Insights for:

• Pricing Flexibility (0.0)
• Ability to Understand Needs (0.0)
• Quality of Technical Support (0.0)
• Quality of End-User Training (0.0)
• Timeliness of Vendor Response (0.0)

Netcraft Critical Weaknesses:

• Outdated, confusing interface
• Zero customization
• No attack-type reporting
• Entirely reactive
• Poor customer support
• Excessive false positives
• Minimal market enthusiasm

Stage 4: Bolster – AI Fixation Without Results

As a modern digital risk protection (DRP) platform, leveraging AI and automation to detect and remediate online threats at speed, Bolster position themselves as a more complete solution than the previous ZeroFox alternatives we’ve looked at. They also endorse a specific philosophy in digital risk protection: that AI and automation alone can solve the external threat problem. But beneath impressive-sounding automation statistics lies a more complex story about the trade-offs between speed and comprehensive protection.

Bolster's reliance on AI creates significant blind spots, as the platform restricts its monitoring to data sources that can be easily automated, potentially missing threats that require human analysis or contextual understanding.

Josh Mayfield acknowledges Bolster's technical focus but points to inherent limitations: "They're very good at being niche, training their AI models to be ever more precise. But they're doing it with ever less data because they don't have a ZeroFox capability of going out there and clicking everything on the Internet and scraping what happens."

While this approach works for organizations with limited digital footprints, medium to large organizations with more ambitious online presences may find the platform inadequate.

"If you have one website, one domain, a couple of products and are a minor kind of organization, it's likely that Bolster's AI will be able to keep up with your needs,” Mayfield says.

“But if you're any sort of larger business, you're likely so labyrinthian and spread out in your digital presence, that their models just won’t be able to learn where you are or see where you need help.” 

A lag time between AI training cycles also means Bolster's models may struggle to detect novel attack patterns or current threat actor techniques. For enterprises generating content with AI and expanding across platforms daily, Bolster's pre-trained models are already obsolete before deployment.

"Their AI has been pre-trained, and probably the last training run was six months ago," Mayfield explains. "So, it's not up-to-date on what's happening with threats right now." 

Perhaps Bolster's most significant drawback is their weak remediation capabilities. Takedowns are limited to providers with whom Bolster have automated relationships, meaning complex takedown scenarios requiring negotiation or manual intervention may fall outside their capabilities.

The company also lacks comprehensive capabilities in several areas that are becoming increasingly integral to overall security:

• Dark web monitoring: Limited to basic keyword searches with minimal human intelligence gathering
• Executive protection: No dedicated capabilities for protecting high-value individuals
• Physical security intelligence: No monitoring for real-world threats to personnel or facilities
• Geopolitical context: Limited threat intelligence beyond automated detection

Bolster Critical Weaknesses:

• Static, outdated AI models
• Can't adapt to new threats
• Minimal market presence
• Just 4 reviews on G2
• Can't handle enterprise complexity
• No real-time learning

Stage 5: Recorded Future – Academic Theory, Not Protection

Since their founding in 2007, Recorded Future have established themselves as heavyweights in the threat intelligence space. Now under Mastercard ownership following a recent acquisition, the platform is becoming a cautionary tale about the gap between theory and application.

Recorded Future's strength lies in its ability to aggregate vast amounts of data from across open, deep, and dark web sources.

"Recorded Future are outstanding at academic research, absolutely outstanding," admits Mayfield. 

"If you want to know the shoe size of an APT (advanced persistent threat) that's coming out of Tehran, they're great.”

"But they don't fight threats, they study them from afar, just making observations and writing them down.” 

Recorded Future can provide you with a flood of raw intelligence, data, but without substantial internal analyst resources, organizations often struggle to extract actionable insights. 

"If you're JP Morgan Chase with 2,000 security engineers and over 150 threat analysts, you're going to love getting all of it," Mayfield says. 

"But if you're a typical security team. Recorded Future is going to be difficult to metabolize."

Users consistently report issues with noisy alerts and false positives, creating a paradox where more data actually impedes effective threat response.

It doesn’t help that the interface is complex, with a steep learning curve that multiple user reviews cite as a major challenge for adoption. 

Recorded Future's threat remediation solution is another significant shortcoming. Unlike competitors who handle disruption in-house, Recorded Future relies on third-party contractors for takedown services-a dependency that introduces delays to a process that counts on a rapid response for success. 

Mayfield believes the Mastercard acquisition adds another layer of concern for customers: "What if Mastercard says your takedown is not a priority? That's a big difference. At ZeroFox, we serve the client directly."

Recorded Future Critical Weaknesses:

• Outsourced takedowns
• Difficult interface
• No human curation
• Weak dark web intelligence
• Now controlled by Mastercard
• Requires massive internal teams

Stage 6: ZeroFox – Total External Cybersecurity

While competitors struggle with fragmented solutions, outsourced capabilities, and limited coverage, ZeroFox deliver the only unified platform for complete external cybersecurity. 

"We start by understanding who you are: who are your people, your brands, your domains, your assets, your infrastructure, your attack surface?" Mayfield explains. 

"From there, we keep you safe as you become more digitized. You have a sentinel going out into those online spaces with you, but looking out for the evil, looking out for the threats, looking out for the risks."

The platform combines AI-powered detection with expert human analysts, in-house takedown teams, and a powerful Global Disruption Network. But those are not the only advantages ZeroFox offers.

Here's how ZeroFox addresses every weakness found in alternative solutions:

Scalable Unified Platform vs. Point Solutions 

Instead of forcing organizations to cobble together multiple vendors for different threats, ZeroFox provides one unified platform covering:

• External Attack Surface Management with AI-driven remediation recommendations
• Brand, Domain, and Executive Protection across 100+ networks
• Physical Security Intelligence for real-world threat monitoring
• PII Removal from data broker sites
• Account Takeover Protection and In-Line Moderation
• Comprehensive Social Media Monitoring and protection

ZeroFox accommodates organizations from SMBs to Fortune 500 companies, with the platform architecture supporting growth without requiring infrastructure replacement. ZeroFox’s thousands of customers include four of the Fortune 10 companies.

Maximum Coverage 

ZeroFox monitors over 1 billion content sources and 65 million URLs to protect 6,200+ brands across social media, domains, mobile app stores, and digital marketplaces.

On the dark web, while others provide only basic keyword searches, ZeroFox experts continuously monitor 1000+ dark web forums and engage threat actors to gather actionable intelligence from the criminal underground.

Actionable Up-to-date Intelligence, Not Academic Research

Unlike Bolster's static AI models that might be six months out of date, or Recorded Future's flood of unfiltered data, ZeroFox combines advanced AI with 100+ threat analysts to ensure every critical alert is validated by human analysts before escalation—not just flagged by algorithms. 

Operating from three global 24/7/365 Security Operations Centers and speaking over 27 languages, these experts get to know your specific brands, domains, and assets to ensure you receive only relevant and actionable intelligence tailored to your organization's Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIRs). ZeroFox intelligence also includes clear recommendations and next steps, enabling security teams to act immediately rather than spending hours interpreting raw data.

Unmatched In-House Disruption at Scale 

In contrast to ReliaQuest, Cyberint, and Recorded Future who outsource their takedowns to third parties, ZeroFox maintains a 100% in-house disruption team. This direct control means faster response times and no dependency on external vendors' priorities. While Cyberint manages only 3,600 takedowns a year and limits clients to 270 per month, ZeroFox executes over 1 million takedowns annually with a 95% success rate—including 40,000+ malicious domain takedowns in the last 12 months alone.

A Global Disruption Network That Actually Works 

Where competitors lack comprehensive disruption capabilities, ZeroFox leverages a Global Disruption Network of 50+ partners including ISPs, hosts, registrars, and Google. Thanks to their exclusive partnership with Google Web Risk, malicious domains can be blocked across 5 billion devices in as little as 15 minutes—while takedowns are still processing. This "threat exposure gap" elimination is something no competitor can match. 

Physical Security

ZeroFox protects both the digital and physical security of 21,000+ executives and VIPs worldwide, monitoring risks, and providing real-time alerts for threats to people, locations, and events.

Easy Integration

ZeroFox streamlines integration with over 40+ pre-built connectors for SIEMs, SOARs, TIPs, and other security tools, plus intuitive interfaces that minimize training time and expert configuration support to ensure rapid deployment without overwhelming your team. The cloud-based platform typically enables full deployment within days, with dedicated Customer Success Managers ensuring smooth onboarding.

Direct Client Service, Not Corporate Priorities 

Following Mastercard's acquisition of Recorded Future and Check Point's acquisition of Cyberint, these platforms now serve corporate masters first, clients second. ZeroFox remains independent and client-focused, ensuring every takedown request and threat response prioritizes customer needs—not parent company politics.

Proven ROI 

Forrester carried out a Total Economic Impact study on ZeroFox and concluded that the platform’s customers can expect to achieve a 267% ROI thanks to:

• Blocked brand impersonation incidents, reducing revenue loss and reputation damage
• Prevented executive impersonations, saving up to $44,000 per incident
• Reduced phishing campaign duration from days to hours
• Faster threat detection and response, minimizing exposure window
• Lower incident response costs through automated takedowns (saving hundreds of thousands in manual labor)
• Improved customer trust scores, maintaining brand reputation
• Operational efficiency gained by consolidating multiple point solutions into one platform

Forget ZeroFox Alternatives – OG ZeroFox is the Complete Solution 

While ZeroFox alternatives force trade-offs—ReliaQuest's basic detection without action, Cyberint's weakened post-acquisition state, Netcraft's broken automation, Bolster's limited AI scope, or Recorded Future's impractical data floods—organizations no longer need to accept partial protection or juggle multiple vendors.

The journey from zero protection to complete security ends with ZeroFox— the only platform built to protect everything outside your perimeter, everywhere threats emerge, every moment of every day.

Request a ZeroFox demo today to discover why thousands of organizations trust ZeroFox to safeguard their digital presence, disrupt threats before they materialize, and provide the intelligence needed to stay ahead of adversaries.